Re: Keeping track of CGAffineTransform's action
Re: Keeping track of CGAffineTransform's action
- Subject: Re: Keeping track of CGAffineTransform's action
- From: Pierre Berloquin <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:33:25 +0200
Sorry about 3.0. Actually I haven't downloaded it yet and I'm not under NDA.
I got what little I know from a previous conversation here.
2009/6/2 Kyle Sluder <email@hidden>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Pierre Berloquin <email@hidden>
> wrote:
> > You are right on an efficiency point of view, except I also use other
> Quartz
> > functions, for special text renderings for example, in view of later 3D
> > treatments, and it's logically saner to remain in one programming context
> > rather than shift between CGRect and Affine.Yet Apple's philosophy on the
> > matter is not very clear, transfering some Quartz functions to NS objects
> in
> > 3.0 instead of making Quartz unavoidable ...
>
> I would beg to differ. I don't see how it makes more sense to use an
> affine transform to translate content when the semantic effect is
> really the translation of the view itself.
>
> BTW, iPhone 3.0 is still under NDA, you can't talk about it here.
>
> --Kyle Sluder
>
--
Blogs : http://bibliobs.nouvelobs.com/blog/jeux-litteraires
http://pierre-berloquin.blogspot.com/
Développement durable des neurones par le jeu de réflexion
www.crealude.net
Sustainable development of neurones through mind games
www.crealude.net/us
Que fait-on pour les mal-codants ?
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden