• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect?


  • Subject: Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect?
  • From: Chunk 1978 <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:01:45 -0400

thanks.  and sorry, i just assumed it would have been the same on the
different platforms.  also, i couldn't find the iPhone dev mailing
list on apple's site.  if you know it offhand please let me know.

thanks again.

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Michael Ash<email@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Chunk 1978<email@hidden> wrote:
>> hum... it seems that Quartz Debugger's Flash Screen function isn't
>> much help with using the iPhone simulator... since it's an emulator it
>> will flash the entire screen regardless if setNeedsDisplayInRect is
>> called.
>>
>> which brings me back to my first question... i know that
>> setNeedsDisplay will redraw the entire view, and by using
>> setNeedsDisplayInRect will only refresh the part of the view that is
>> changing, but how does setFrame factor into this?  i'm assuming that
>> setFrame is the same as setNeedsDisplay, since the entire view's frame
>> is being set (or continuously reset with drag events), but does this
>> resetting of the frame (setFrame:) affect the view's superview?
>
> It would be helpful if you would have mentioned that you are talking
> about UIView in your first message. This is primarily a Mac mailing
> list and so the assumption is that you are discussing NSView.
>
> UIViews are always implicitly layer backed. This means that each view
> has a backing buffer, and superviews never need to be redrawn due to a
> change in a subview.
>
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect?
      • From: Alex Kac <email@hidden>
    • Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect?
      • From: Michael Ash <email@hidden>
References: 
 >is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect? (From: Chunk 1978 <email@hidden>)
 >Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect? (From: Michael Ash <email@hidden>)
 >Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect? (From: Chunk 1978 <email@hidden>)
 >Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect? (From: Chunk 1978 <email@hidden>)
 >Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect? (From: Chunk 1978 <email@hidden>)
 >Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect? (From: Michael Ash <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect?
  • Next by Date: Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect?
  • Previous by thread: Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect?
  • Next by thread: Re: is setFrame as optimal as setNeedsDisplayInRect?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread