• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: question about informal protocols
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: question about informal protocols


  • Subject: Re: question about informal protocols
  • From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:21:22 +0100

Le 20 nov. 2009 à 21:09, Michael de Haan a écrit :

>>
>>
>> The usual way is to NOT implements the NSObject category and test if the delegate implements the method using -respondsToSelector:
>> But this way works too if you don't want to have to test before sending your message.
>>
>> Anyway, informal protocols are "deprecated" in favor of @protocol with @optional method.
>>
>>
>> -- Jean-Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Did not see that it was deprecated, but will take your lead and convert them to that. Does the, in your opinion, "optional" addition pretty much replace categories as a whole, or is there still a role for them?
>


They are not formally deprecated (that's why I used quotes), but Apple replaced most if not all Cocoa informal protocols in 10.6 and there is no reason to use them anymore.

@optional replaces categories used as informal protocol, but this is not the only usage for categories. They are very useful if you want to add a method to an existing class.


-- Jean-Daniel




_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >question about informal protocols (From: Michael de Haan <email@hidden>)
 >Re: question about informal protocols (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: question about informal protocols (From: Michael de Haan <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: question about informal protocols
  • Next by Date: Re: question about informal protocols
  • Previous by thread: Re: question about informal protocols
  • Next by thread: Re: question about informal protocols
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread