Re: Carbon is C++?
Re: Carbon is C++?
- Subject: Re: Carbon is C++?
- From: Paul Bruneau <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:35:03 -0500
That is excellent and I really like the sound of it. Someone please inform the authors of Apple's iPhone sample code so that I won't have to deal with C++ anymore! (I'm looking at YOU, SpeakHere!)
On Feb 28, 2010, at 10:24 PM, Erik Buck wrote:
> I disagree. I have written very low latency device drivers in Objective-C. Why do you think Objective-C has too much "latency" for audio? When properly used, Objective-C programs are no more likely to be preempted than any other kind of program. Message dispatch generally has constant time and is only 2.5 times the cost of a C function call. There aren't many function calls or messages sent in audio processing anyway. Signal processing routines tend to be long loops. Objective-C _IS_ C which means it is likely usable in any situation where C is usable.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden