• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Carbon is C++?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Carbon is C++?


  • Subject: Re: Carbon is C++?
  • From: David Rowland <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:56:20 -0800

On Feb 28, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Paul Bruneau wrote:

> That is excellent and I really like the sound of it. Someone please inform the authors of Apple's iPhone sample code so that I won't have to deal with C++ anymore! (I'm looking at YOU, SpeakHere!)

SpeakHere displays one of the things I like very much about C++,  the special status of constructors and destructors. You must have them. If they do nothing there is no extra cost. If a base class requires initialization, the compiler will insist you provide it. No forgetting [super init] and the like.


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Carbon is C++? (From: Chunk 1978 <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Carbon is C++? (From: Ian Joyner <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Carbon is C++? (From: Paul Bruneau <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Carbon is C++? (From: Kyle Sluder <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Carbon is C++? (From: Erik Buck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Carbon is C++? (From: Paul Bruneau <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Carbon is C++?
  • Next by Date: Re: Where in the MVC should my code go?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Carbon is C++?
  • Next by thread: Re: Carbon is C++?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread