Re: docs, KVO and NSUserDefaults etc.
Re: docs, KVO and NSUserDefaults etc.
- Subject: Re: docs, KVO and NSUserDefaults etc.
- From: Matt Neuburg <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:57:24 -0700
- Thread-topic: docs, KVO and NSUserDefaults etc.
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:40:27 -0400, Scott Anguish <email@hidden> said:
>If it isn't documented as being KVO compliant it is best not to assume it is
guaranteed to be in the future.
>
>
>On Jun 21, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
>
>> But how is the user supposed to know this? Or is the user who discovers this
>> supposed to ignore it?
Thanks, Scott. This is what I was afraid the answer might be. But gosh, this
sort of KVO compliance is awfully useful, esp. on iPhone where there are no
bindings, no user defaults controller, etc. It's really a pity not to be
allowed to use it. If there's time and you could blip the engineering folks
to double-check this it would be very cool (I understand if there isn't
time). Tx again - m.
--
matt neuburg, phd = email@hidden, <http://www.tidbits.com/matt/>
A fool + a tool + an autorelease pool = cool!
AppleScript: the Definitive Guide - Second Edition!
http://www.tidbits.com/matt/default.html#applescriptthings
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden