Re: "-arch i386" -- Still useful?
Re: "-arch i386" -- Still useful?
- Subject: Re: "-arch i386" -- Still useful?
- From: Jay O'Conor <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 13:33:02 -0700
First generation Intel MacBook Pros use a Core Duo (not Core 2 Duo) chip and therefore can only run 32-bit code. Earlier Intel Mac Minis are also 32-bit only, using Core Solo or Core Duo.
I'm writing this on one of those 32-bit only Intel MacBook Pros, so we're definitely out here. I wouldn't abandon 32-bit Intel systems quite yet, unless you have a compelling need.
Jay O'Conor
email@hidden
--
All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them. -- Walt Disney
On May 6, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Patrick M. Rutkowski wrote:
> Is the "-arch i386" argument to gcc (for building for i386 as opposed
> to x86_64). My fairly new iMac, for example, seems to be x86_64. Are
> there any intel macs which really are i386, and could not run x86_64
> binaries?
>
> -Patrick
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden