Re: Does anyone find Restore Snapshot kind of weak?
Re: Does anyone find Restore Snapshot kind of weak?
- Subject: Re: Does anyone find Restore Snapshot kind of weak?
- From: Kyle Sluder <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 07:48:23 -0800
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012, at 03:51 AM, Charles Srstka wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2012, at 4:39 AM, "email@hidden"
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Interactive rebasing is quite straightforward.
> >
> > # fiddle with the last 10 commits
> > git rebase -i HEAD~10
>
> I think that what Greg was referring to was the fact that it can't be
> done from within Xcode without dropping down to the Terminal, which is
> something that the Xcode team could certainly fix.
How about we get them to fix the IDE before we have them write a git
GUI?
>
> > I also subscribe to the commit small and often philosophy.
> > If I don't I tend to end up with a ball of changes that ultimately get committed under some very vague title as I have forgotten the detail of what I was doing.
>
> That's exactly my experience as well. Then one of those changes in the
> commit causes a side-effect, and on looking back on the change that
> caused it, you can't remember what specifically it was supposed to do in
> the first place.
One might argue that it would be a good idea for Xcode to offer the
ability to commit snapshots to a branch on the git repo to which all the
affected files belong, if one such repo exists. That seems a lot less of
a burden that writing a wrapper for interactive rebase.
--Kyle Sluder
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden