Re: Does anyone find Restore Snapshot kind of weak?
Re: Does anyone find Restore Snapshot kind of weak?
- Subject: Re: Does anyone find Restore Snapshot kind of weak?
- From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:47:58 -0600
On Nov 29, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Kyle Sluder <email@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012, at 03:51 AM, Charles Srstka wrote:
>> On Nov 29, 2012, at 4:39 AM, "email@hidden"
>> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> Interactive rebasing is quite straightforward.
>>>
>>> # fiddle with the last 10 commits
>>> git rebase -i HEAD~10
>>
>> I think that what Greg was referring to was the fact that it can't be
>> done from within Xcode without dropping down to the Terminal, which is
>> something that the Xcode team could certainly fix.
>
> How about we get them to fix the IDE before we have them write a git GUI?
Well, Xcode already provides a partial git GUI...
>>
>>> I also subscribe to the commit small and often philosophy.
>>> If I don't I tend to end up with a ball of changes that ultimately get committed under some very vague title as I have forgotten the detail of what I was doing.
>>
>> That's exactly my experience as well. Then one of those changes in the
>> commit causes a side-effect, and on looking back on the change that
>> caused it, you can't remember what specifically it was supposed to do in
>> the first place.
>
> One might argue that it would be a good idea for Xcode to offer the
> ability to commit snapshots to a branch on the git repo to which all the
> affected files belong, if one such repo exists. That seems a lot less of
> a burden that writing a wrapper for interactive rebase.
That works. This, too, would be more efficient than having a whole separate repository.
Charles
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden