Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
- Subject: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
- From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:55:11 -0700
I find myself frequently wanting to do something like this:
Parent
children to-many to Child
activeChild to-one to Child
Child
parent to-one to Parent
But Core Data complains that activeChild is misconfigured because it doesn't have an inverse. But I have no need for an inverse, why does Core Data?
Thanks,
--
Rick
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden