Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
- Subject: Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse in Core Data?
- From: Kyle Sluder <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:03:42 -0700
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 01:55 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
> But Core Data complains that activeChild is misconfigured because it
> doesn't have an inverse. But I have no need for an inverse, why does Core
> Data?
Apple's explanation, straight from the docs:
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/cocoa/conceptual/coredata/Articles/cdRelationships.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40001857-SW6
--Kyle Sluder
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden