• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code


  • Subject: Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
  • From: Appa Rao Mulpuri <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 06:27:52 +0000
  • Thread-topic: Tech update avoiding legacy code

We have limited people on 10.5, but revenue prospective we couldn¹t ignore
them.

Thanks for the priority order. In GDC Vs ARC, GCD is the first one to opt
unless if you are app has more memory leaks. Correct me If I am wrong.

Not sure, different code base will workout in this case. Implementation
wise can handle better, but App distribution is the problem.

- Apparao

On 8/14/15, 11:31 AM, "Jens Alfke" <email@hidden> wrote:

>Do you have a definite business need to keep supporting 10.5? I can¹t
>believe you have many customers still running it ‹ it came out in 2007
>(the last release I worked on at Apple!)
>
>In terms of priorities, I think ARC is the biggest win, followed by GCD.
>Some people might rate auto-layout higher; I might if I did more GUI
>stuff.
>
>FYI, there¹s a 3rd party library that patches in ARC weak-reference
>support for 10.6. (I don¹t remember what it¹s called or where it is, but
>I¹m sure someone here does.)
>
>‹Jens


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
      • From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Tech update avoiding legacy code (From: Appa Rao Mulpuri <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code (From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
  • Next by Date: Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
  • Previous by thread: Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
  • Next by thread: Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread