• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code


  • Subject: Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
  • From: Stephane Sudre <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 09:18:01 +0200

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Jens Alfke <email@hidden> wrote:
> Do you have a definite business need to keep supporting 10.5? I can’t believe you have many customers still running it — it came out in 2007 (the last release I worked on at Apple!)
>
> In terms of priorities, I think ARC is the biggest win, followed by GCD. Some people might rate auto-layout higher; I might if I did more GUI stuff.

Auto-layout in (too) many cases is "no gain, lots of pain".
Considering the issues (e.g. performance) with the earlier versions,
planning on losing only 10.5 and 10.6 might be overly optimistic. Even
more if Storyboards are included.

Appa Rao Mulpuri wrote:
> ARC - We lost Mac 10.5 support. And chance of loosing 10.6 as Weak references are not supported in OS X v10.6.

Regarding ARC, there are still some limitations in 10.7 in the AppKit
(window controllers) IIRC.

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Tech update avoiding legacy code (From: Appa Rao Mulpuri <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code (From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
  • Next by Date: Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
  • Previous by thread: Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
  • Next by thread: Re: Tech update avoiding legacy code
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread