• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Avoiding link conflicts with a static library
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Avoiding link conflicts with a static library


  • Subject: Re: Avoiding link conflicts with a static library
  • From: Saagar Jha <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 17:45:15 -0700

You could weak link against OpenCV then dlopen it at runtime depending on
whether it’s already loaded or not. As for packaging, I’d stick them both in a
zip with a README telling them where to drag each thing in Xcode.

Saagar Jha

> On Apr 5, 2018, at 01:42, Redler Eyal <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>>>>> We have two issues with the dynamic framework
>>>>> 1. It makes it easier to pirate our technology (having our stuff neatly
>>>>> packaged seperaterly)
>>>>
>>>> I may be misunderstanding you, but why does your code need to be separate?
>>>> Can’t you statically link against your framework, which dynamically opens
>>>> OpenCV (packaged as a framework)?
>>>
>>> At the moment, we deliver a static framework. This is linked statically to
>>> the client's app and delivered inside the main executable to the app store.
>>> If we switch to a dynamic library then our library will be a separate
>>> component that is delivered as such to the app store. The potential pirate
>>> will only have to dig our the library from the application package (and
>>> overcome the other protections, of-course)
>>
>> OK, but is there anything stopping you from having your static library
>> dynamically open OpenCV?
>
> Perhaps not but I'm wondering
> a. Will it actually solve the issue (the conflict with the clients OpenCV)?
> b. Is it possible to package a static framework with a dynamic library in one
> package?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Avoiding link conflicts with a static library (From: Redler Eyal <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Avoiding link conflicts with a static library (From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Avoiding link conflicts with a static library (From: Redler Eyal <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Avoiding link conflicts with a static library (From: Saagar Jha <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Avoiding link conflicts with a static library (From: Redler Eyal <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Avoiding link conflicts with a static library (From: Saagar Jha <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Avoiding link conflicts with a static library (From: Redler Eyal <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: runModalSession handling
  • Next by Date: Re: Avoiding link conflicts with a static library
  • Previous by thread: Re: Avoiding link conflicts with a static library
  • Next by thread: Re: Avoiding link conflicts with a static library
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread