Re: Cocoa-dev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 72
Re: Cocoa-dev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 72
- Subject: Re: Cocoa-dev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 72
- From: Jens Alfke via Cocoa-dev <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 13:27:20 -0700
> On Aug 27, 2019, at 12:35 PM, Turtle Creek Software <email@hidden>
> wrote:
>
> We are happy with the lifetime management in our C++ classes.
You're having mysterious ref-counting bugs, so the fact that you're storing
Obj-C references as void* sets off alarm bells.
> And C++ keeps improving. ARC doesn't go there and that is fine.
Actually with Obj-C++ you get the best of both, so it's not either/or. And it
would let you stop lying to the compiler, which would make your code more
reliable and readable.
—Jens
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
References: | |
| >Re: Cocoa-dev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 72 (From: Turtle Creek Software via Cocoa-dev <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Cocoa-dev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 72 (From: Jens Alfke via Cocoa-dev <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Cocoa-dev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 72 (From: Turtle Creek Software via Cocoa-dev <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Cocoa-dev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 72 (From: Jens Alfke via Cocoa-dev <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Cocoa-dev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 72 (From: Turtle Creek Software via Cocoa-dev <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Cocoa-dev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 72 (From: Jens Alfke via Cocoa-dev <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Cocoa-dev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 72 (From: Turtle Creek Software via Cocoa-dev <email@hidden>) |