• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs


  • Subject: Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs
  • From: Joel <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 18:52:41 -0600

tflash wrote:

<rant>This situation reminds me of the early transistor radios. They
often loudly touted the number of transistors inside, never
mentioning why more transistors should make it perform better than a
basic five-tube radio, and also never mentioning that many of those
transistors were not fully utilized, sometimes only used as diodes,
sometimes simply soldered to isolated pads on the printed circuit
board!</rant>

Tubes? Transistors?

Another question to ask: why are the specs of a $400 scanner so
similar to those of an $1,100 one? Definitely something fishy here.

Quality hardware and manufacturing practices are points to consider here. It's a backwards/forwards game where sometimes you pay for quality because it's there, sometimes someone offers the same hardware components to more than one buyer. A manufacturer may try to roll out overruns or stock which didn't pass muster on quality with the buyer. Sometimes these refusals are merely esthetic (light green circuit boards, etc.). So instead of heaving the overruns and refusals, the manufacturer reroutes the stock to option buyers (like Radio Shack). This can result in similarly featured devices - some so similar the only difference is really the name, some so different the only similarities are the specs on the individual components.

Jan Steinman wrote:
Unless you part with $400-$1100 on a whim, I'd recommend taking some
difficult material down and having it scanned on each. That's what I
did when I bought a film scanner, and the side-by-side results were
enlightening. For a distant second best evaluation, find some good
magazine reviews.

IMHO, the situation has gotten so bad that scanner specs are nearly
meaningless -- just like printer specs.


Which is good advice. After all, mechanical, digital and optical interpolations are in the eye of the beholder.

--
joel johnstone
designtype
Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
email: work: email@hidden
color geek in residence, reality notwithstanding


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs
      • From: tflash <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: D-Max of Scanners
  • Next by Date: Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs
  • Previous by thread: Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs
  • Next by thread: Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread