• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs


  • Subject: Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs
  • From: email@hidden
  • Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 10:24:29 EST

on 12/4/00 9:21 PM, Jan Steinman at email@hidden wrote:

> Something is rotten here. Bits-per-pixel and Dmax should roughly
> correspond, unless those are "marketing bits" instead "real bits." A
> "real" 14 bit scanner should achieve Dmax circa 3.6. If it's
> quantizing to 14 bits, but for whatever reason (noise, whatever), it
> can only achieve 3.2 Dmax, then a number of those bits are simply
> returning noise.

First time I've heard this one; I'll have to add it to my digital legends
list...

C. David Tobie
Design Cooperative
email@hidden


  • Prev by Date: PitStop Pro server
  • Next by Date: Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs
  • Previous by thread: Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs
  • Next by thread: Re: Flatbed scanners vs Pro Photo CDs
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread