Re: Monitor Calibration
Re: Monitor Calibration
- Subject: Re: Monitor Calibration
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:19:43 EST
In a message dated 12/8/00 3:53:49 PM, email@hidden writes:
>
I recently read somewhere (might have been by Bruce Fraser) that
>
there's a case to be made for calibrating the mionitor to 6500/1.8 while
>
>
using a workspace profile that uses 6500/2.2. Something to do with
>
monitor 1.8 offering better midtone seperation which more resembles print
>
>
while the higher gamut 2.2 workspace offers more tones to play with.
>
Hopfully someone can jump in to clairify my (mis)understanding of what
>
I
>
read somewhere. Might even have been an earlier thread...
Or it might have been me, I do that myself and have suggested it in various
places over time, though I don't argue against a simple 2.2/6500 throughout
scheme either...
C. David Tobie
Design Cooperative
email@hidden