Re: Kodak 9500 resolved
Re: Kodak 9500 resolved
- Subject: Re: Kodak 9500 resolved
- From: Henrik Holmegaard <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 12:05:37 +0100
Glenn Kowalski <email@hidden> wrote:
One
oddity though--I created the device link with the relative
colorimetric intent, but both the Harlequinn RIP and ColorThink
report it as Perceptual.
According to the spec the LUT is always named AtoB0 (: alphanumeric
naming scheme).
The actual intent is intended to be stated in the profile header
(Perceptual, Relative Colorimetric, Absolute Colorimetric,
Saturation: alphabetic naming scheme).
ColorThink just writes the alphabetic name tag wrong (: as Perceptual
when it's actually something else you've built).
I can't remember whether this also affects ColorBlind Edit.
Overall, in workflows where device link profiles are deployed at the
back-end in RIPs and color servers, auditing / rebuilding the links
and documenting them in detail might be a good idea.
--
------------------------------------------
Henrik Holmegaard, TechWrite
Stationay +45 3880 0721 - +45 3881 0721
Mobile +45 2178 3959
Toelloesevej 69, 2700 Broenshoej, Denmark
------------------------------------------