• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Links revisited
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Links revisited


  • Subject: Links revisited
  • From: Henrik Holmegaard <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 19:46:17 +0100

Steve wrote:

There is no way to determine, based on the contents of a
ICC-compliant device link profile the rendering intents used when the
profile was created.

The header description (Perceptual, Relative Colorimetric, Absolute Colorimetric, or Saturation) has that *documenting* function wrt links.

The digit system has no function wrt links because there is only one LUT and *selecting* a LUT based on intent is therefore not meaningful.

All I'm saying is that if the powers that be deem the digit system meaningless wrt links, which is surely correct, then please can we get rid of the digit system wrt links?

Why use a meaningless system in the spec when those who write the spec know it's meaningless (: not the spec, of course -:)).


  • Prev by Date: Re: Profiling CcMmYK vs CMYK inkjet printers
  • Next by Date: softproofing cmyk images in PhotoShop 6
  • Previous by thread: Re: OptiCal and SpectroLino
  • Next by thread: softproofing cmyk images in PhotoShop 6
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread