Re: Profiler PRO
Re: Profiler PRO
- Subject: Re: Profiler PRO
- From: Joel <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:41:50 -0500
heavily clipped from Terry and David's thread:
Terry Wyse wrote:
The hole I still have in my thinking is:
The hole where I've been sitting following this thread!
More questions to follow I'm sure!
on 8/31/01 7:25 PM, email@hidden wrote:
> No you define the settings, and use the same definitions when creating the
> profile.
and...
> Exactly, but you are not making a profile out of it, you are
simply setting
> it up as a CMYK space in Photoshop.
Terry:
Ahhhh...so you use ProfilerPro to define the settings (individual and total
ink limits and tonal gradation?), it saves this as a CMYK setup that you use
in Photoshop to convert the RGB chart to CMYK and off you go. Did I miss
anything?
One more question for me please. I'm sure CDT has heard enough from
me about ink channel limits so:
When you convert RGB>CMYK which intent is used? I would think
perceptual would maintain the relationship of colors to one another
for an 'ideal' output gamut measurement which also includes its own
form of 'smoothing.' No?
Just curious.
--
joel johnstone - designtype
Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
(Cyan sunsets, scumdots and Guinness doth not a proofprint make)