Re: hardware advice
Re: hardware advice
- Subject: Re: hardware advice
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 13:29:36 EST
In a message dated 12/3/01 1:11:32 PM, email@hidden writes:
>
Please correct me
>
if I am mistaken as I don't have time to read the archives regarding this,
>
but aside from certain problematic issues you feel are important to bring
>
up, I don't recall you mentioning anything positive about the device which
>
honestly struck me as quite strange.
Alternately, I can recall posting (I assume to this list among others)
complaints large and small about every other spectro I've ever used... the
EyeOne is the new kid, and has been getting its turn as it gets broken in.
In terms of positive comments for the EyeOne, forgive me if I've already
posted this particular set of comments on this particular list: Now that the
difficulties of supporting theEyeOne for ProfilerPRO are over, the device
appears to run smoothly, make fast, foolproof target reads, and build
profiles a bit more easily and about as fast as the SpectroCam (I would
assume faster and easier under Windows)... my only remaining issue for this u
sage being the lack of UV filtration, which apparently is about to be
addressed.
C. David Tobie
Design Cooperative
email@hidden