• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Workflow critique needed
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Workflow critique needed


  • Subject: Re: Workflow critique needed
  • From: Chris Halford <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 10:28:33 -0600

on 2/3/01 10:18 AM, Andrew Rodney at email@hidden wrote:

>
> The main reason NOT to is that monitors are always changing, you have to
> calibrate and profile them all the time. So by that fact alone, using a
> monitor profile for a working space insures that you are constantly getting
> different conditions in which to edit your files. Using a Working Space
> insures that the editing is consistent forever. If the display changes it's
> condition, the editing (and conversions) remain consistent. Only the preview
> suffers meaning it's still a good idea to calibrate and profile a display on
> a regular basis.


That raises another question.

How frequently are people making new profiles for their monitor? One of the
fears I have is replacing a good profile with a bad one.

C.
--
Chris Halford
C.T.O.
www.iccTools.com

mobile email: email@hidden
*Short messages*

--


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Workflow critique needed
      • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Workflow critique needed (From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Workflow critique needed
  • Next by Date: Re: Workflow critique needed
  • Previous by thread: Re: Workflow critique needed
  • Next by thread: Re: Workflow critique needed
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread