Re: [colortheory] Scanning negatives
Re: [colortheory] Scanning negatives
- Subject: Re: [colortheory] Scanning negatives
- From: Alan Kochis <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2001 14:12:05 -0500
on 3/4/01 12:41 PM, Tara Marlowe at email@hidden wrote:
>
Can anyone explain the basic differences between scanning negatives and
>
transparencies. My impression is that is is more difficult to scan negatives
>
but I'm not sure what the problems are or what needs to be done differently.
>
>
Tara Marlowe
>
DIG IT AL, Inc.
>
NYC
>
_________________________________________________________________
>
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
email@hidden
>
>
>
>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
One of the difficulties that we always come across is the expectations of
the client. They do not have " hard copy" of the negative, and if they do
they have a blown out print of some sort. I sometimes need to put the
negative on 3 scanners to prove to the clients that their negs are terrible,
not my scans ..... by terrible I mean, out of focus, overexposed,
underexposed or have some sort of color cast, which I will in turn charge
them to fix!!!!
Alan Kochis