Re: Colorvision Spyder& photocal vs Lacie Blue eye
Re: Colorvision Spyder& photocal vs Lacie Blue eye
- Subject: Re: Colorvision Spyder& photocal vs Lacie Blue eye
- From: jim rich <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 09:19:52 -0500
I work with a color management savvy partner who uses the Blue Eye
Colorimeter and we have tested it against ProfileMaker, Monaco,
ColorSynergy, Printopen etc. We find that the LaCie solution works
just fine and creates an accurate view of the monitor. It sounds
like there was some other computer problem when Andrew tested it.
My .02.
<Andrew Rodney wrote:
We were NOT happy with the appearance of the Blue Eye calibrated colorimeter
at all and ended up using the Spyder.
Rolf wrote
is this a colorimeter issue or a software issue?
If this is a colorimeter issue, whats up with all that
software packages sold?
As far as I know the Blue Eye Colorimeter is a
Sequel Chroma 4, as it is sold with:
Heidelberg ViewOpen ICC (called Viewmaker),
Colorcal (called Optimate).>
Gierling
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list
email@hidden
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
--
Best Regards
Jim Rich
Rich & Associates, LLC
P.O. Box 70882
Chevy Chase MD 20813
301-652-7266
301-652-8665 fax
email:email@hidden