• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Contract proofer combo
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Contract proofer combo


  • Subject: Re: Contract proofer combo
  • From: Henrik Holmegaard <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:48:02 +0100

There are also cases where clents want to proof Scitex CT/LW and TIFF-IT.

Scitex CT is supported in iQueue. But it is a legacy color blind data format. It doesn't support embedding of ICC profiles, so the incoming pixels must be assigned an assumed source ICC profile, and the outgoing pixels can't be tagged with the destination ICC profile. It doesn't support Lab either. All this is just as in BatchMatcherPS described in a whole string of posts.

TIFF-IT is a debatable as industry standard format and is losing to PDF. The PDF/X-(add a figure -:)) specs speak of blind exchange of CMYK. Of course, Photopop and Disintegrator may yet get your PDF, but folks on the ECI list here in Europe are talking about a solution to that, too -:).

Canned spot color databases are fine, but for good metallic simulation, you
need to read and correct each color in my experience.

Yes.

Also, the spot colors need to be calculated
completely independently of the simulation profile. If I print a spot
color, I want it to come out exactly the same whether I am simulating
gravure or offset.

Hmm...this sounds odd to me. If you print the same spot ink on two different papers, the colors will look different. If you print the same spot ink at different screen densities, the colors will look different (the finer the screen the darker the color). I did a calling card once for someone who insisted on blue PMS and a creamy uncoated card stock, and the color looked magenta. Mechanically the printer had done what he was supposed to do, but it also showed that premixed inks and fan guides aren't going to get you device independence -:).

What you can do is look how a particular PMS defined as Lab reproduces in your printer / press gamut. This you can do with VectorPro (which is actually really cool and has nice sorting features, e.g. 'Give me all the PMS coated spots with lower than dE 3 for this profile' ... neat) or GretagMacbeth ColorPicker which is more about measuring and tuning your libraries. VectorPro let's you pick the intent, ColorPicker is hardwired to Absolute Colorimetric which is the only intent you don't get interpretation in (well, all intents have interpolation as I was reminded of a while back, but at least AbsCol doesn't have any remapping / interpretation of lightness or saturation or colors). Then you can see where your spot color lies in the process color space, or in the proofer color space. Sort of a fair warning of troubles ahead -:).

Tiny differences in tone in a ceramic or
furniture will put you into different models or series.

I looked at some French facial compacts recently, five arranged in a circle in a perfume display. I wonder what the dE was from one to the other. Too small for comfort in any case -:).
--
Henrik Holmegaard
TechWrite, Denmark


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Contract proofer combo
      • From: Jens-Uwe Mager <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Editing an Input Profile
  • Next by Date: custom profiles for Epson 3000
  • Previous by thread: Re: Contract proofer combo
  • Next by thread: Re: Contract proofer combo
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread