AW: Analyzing Workflow
AW: Analyzing Workflow
- Subject: AW: Analyzing Workflow
- From: Ulf Grossmann <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 06:28:14 +0200
Hi Tobie,
I think you missunderstood me, I had say, that he should use the
PrinterProfile of his RGB Printer and not the Monitor Profile as Workspace.
I know, that the Adobe RGB is much better as Workingspace as the Monitor RGB
if you want separate to CMYK via ICC, but why should I do this if I have an
original RGB Space for printing.
If somthing is wrong in my thinking please let me know, because RGB is not
so common in the proofing area.
Ulf
-----Originalnachricht-----
Von: email@hidden
An: email@hidden; email@hidden;
email@hidden
Gesendet: 18.05.01 01:24
Betreff: Re: Analyzing Workflow
In a message dated 5/17/01 4:50:12 AM, email@hidden
writes:
>
I think the problem is not your printer Profile it is your Adobe 98 RGB
>
as
>
>
Workspace. ASdobe 98 RGB is based on sRGB only the Green is changed.
Your
>
>
Printers can print more than this Gamut. Try to use your Printer
Profile
>
as
>
>
Workspace in PS6.0 and you will see, that you come closer to your
>
>
printresults.
I can't decide which statement here to disagree with first, since they
all
appear to be wrong! I guess I'll start by objecting to the notion that
Adobe
is sRGB with the green point moved out farther. Have you ever plotted
the tow
together Ulf? Or looked at the phosphor numbers for them?
Suggesting that users work in their monitor space is a giant step
backwards,
especially for someone working for a color managed RIP company.
The idea that your monitor space will have a larger gamut than AdobeRGB
is
also exactly opposite of what a plot or a phosphor check will tell you;
if
there is a problem with using AdobeRGB as a space for prepress work, it
lies
in it being too big for certain uses (that expect a monitor sized space
like
sRGB), not too small.
C. David Tobie
Design Cooperative
email@hidden