Re: LinoColor
Re: LinoColor
- Subject: Re: LinoColor
- From: neil snape <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 09:57:53 +0200
on 21/05/01 08:28, Stefan Zrenner at email@hidden wrote:
>
Yes, thanks I found this option to make the scans but there are a few
>
setting regarding the white point which can be adjusted for the calibration
>
scan, which setting are the best ?
It's best to select the tiffrgb as your calibration profile , more for
viewing a more or less raw rgb space on input. On saving as calibration scan
there are no choices for calibration white or black. You must use no
ColorAssistant or lch corrections as this would no longer be raw
uninfluenced data. In ScanOpen you can chose between fixed , or dynamic
dmin. This is not available in Colorblind. I can't see any benefit of
Colorblind over ScanOpen for a Tango. The image rendering thru ScanOpen 2.1,
4 is really good. The only thing better I've seen for neutrality+ a bit more
gamut, is ICC scan ProfileCity but a bit more noise (albeit for a CCD
scanner).
Neil Snape
email@hidden