• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: LAB as working/interchange space
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LAB as working/interchange space


  • Subject: Re: LAB as working/interchange space
  • From: Stephen <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:17:27 -0400

Henrik writes:
>IMO it's better to balance the size of ICC Lab for actual gamuts
>(defining a 'little Lab' or 'internal Lab'), and the size of RGB
>working spaces for the size of an ICC 'little' Lab (whether anybody
>uses it as working space or not I suppose is another matter). There
>are arguments for RGB working spaces and there are arguments for Lab
>as working space. I can follow both chains of argument, but surely
>the relative sizing of the three dimensional working spaces to each
>other, and the three dimensional working spaces to the four
>dimensional output spaces is worth a thought.

Just a question. Why is it assumed CIELAB is the best color appearance
model?

Stephen White
--


References: 
 >Re: LAB as working/interchange space (From: Henrik Holmegaard <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Lacie 19 inch vs individual guns
  • Next by Date: Re: Responce to Chris
  • Previous by thread: Re: LAB as working/interchange space
  • Next by thread: Re: LAB as working/interchange space
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread