• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Response to Chris
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Response to Chris


  • Subject: Re: Response to Chris
  • From: Joel <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 17:34:00 -0500

From: Chris Cox <email@hidden>

(clip)

You'll care when your 16bit/channel operations make your work take
longer than your competitor working at 8bits/channel with the same
quality result.

Competitor?

Whoa. Dude. No-one told me there was a competitor!

And since LAB is far from intuitive (about the only thing intuitive
about it is lightness) --

(clip) (whack)

Hues got it right there.

I'm not manipulating the data -- but you apparently don't understand
what I'm telling you.
If you know color and image processing even relatively well, then
it's obvious that LAB is not a good working space.

That's because Next Generation producers never built Data to look like Voyageur's Seven-of-Nine.

(oops...could be a wrong thread...or space:)...never mind)
--
joel johnstone - designtype
Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
email: work: email@hidden
(I never look behind me when my printers are running.)


  • Prev by Date: ICC profile naming
  • Next by Date: Re: PROFILING WITH COLORTRON
  • Previous by thread: Re: Response to Chris
  • Next by thread: Re: Lab working space vs. LCH
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread