RE: Eye-One and UV
RE: Eye-One and UV
- Subject: RE: Eye-One and UV
- From: Dan Reid <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:05:31 -0600
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:26:41 -0700, email@hidden wrote:
>
Andrew Rodney wrote: "I haven't had any issues building profiles
>
with my EyeOne to a Fuji PG line of printers, Lightjet and Lambda. Not sure
>
a filter is necessary (although if a unit comes out, I'd like to test it
>
out)."
>
>
>
Don't the photo-quality Epson stocks have UV brighteners in them? I'd think
>
you'd need a filter there...
>
>
-- Jeff Harmon
>
Colorhythm LLC
I was working with a Epson 9500 and their glossy paper stock. Built a
profile using a DTP41UV and Eye-one. Putting the prints next to each other
it was clear that the UV filter made an appreciable difference.
I would go out on a limb and say that Gretag has found come to the same
conclusion and that's why a UV Eye-one is under development.
P.S. There is a UV version of the SpectroCam available too. Remember how
folks said the UV filter was unnecessary with that device too?
--
Dan B. Reid
RENAISSANCE PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGING
Color Imaging Solutions Provider
http://www.rpimaging.com | email@hidden
Toll Free: (866) RGB-CMYK [ 866-742-2695 ]
Local: (505) 471-4126
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.