Re: ScreenProof vs. BlackMagic for 1-Bit TIFFs
Re: ScreenProof vs. BlackMagic for 1-Bit TIFFs
- Subject: Re: ScreenProof vs. BlackMagic for 1-Bit TIFFs
- From: "matt louis" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:12:44 -0600
>
Has anyone done a comparison between BestColor ScreenProof and
>
Serendipty BlackMagic, preferably using the same 1-Bit TIFF files and
>
same printer? I am wondering which holds the halftone dot of the 1-bit
>
tiff files the best while also matching color.
>
>
Any opinions, thoughts, or experiences?
>
>
Abe Hayhurst
>
We Do Graphics Inc.
>
1150 N. Main St.
>
Orange, CA 92867
>
714-997-7390
>
_______________________________________________
I know I am dodging your question, but you might want to consider
evaluating VortexProof from Blanchard Systems for inkjet dot proofing.
Vortex is actually GMG Proof with Dot option but it sells under a
different name in the US. I have seen Epson output (Ultichrome on 9600)
from GMG at 150LPI and was very impressed with the color match to press
sheet. GMG supports icc but works best using proprietary profiles for
reference profiles and a canned profile for the proofer. The canned
profile works because the linearization tools calibrate the proofer into
compliance to the profile.
Matt Louis
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.