• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Custom Made icc profiles for Lightjet
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Custom Made icc profiles for Lightjet


  • Subject: Re: Custom Made icc profiles for Lightjet
  • From: email@hidden (Bruce Fraser)
  • Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 12:05:26 -0800

At 10:49 AM -0800 2/1/02, Steve Upton wrote:
At 12:35 PM +0100 2/1/02, Timothy C. Pitts wrote:
Can someone give me a good source for custom made icc profiles.We don't
have a spectro yet. Our colorimiter does seem to make very good
profiles.
We're printing RGB files to a Lightjet 5000 digital photographic
printer.

I think it is fair to say there are many members on this list who build custom profiles. Our ColorValet service is one of the original services and you can find out more about it here:

<http://www.colorvalet.com/>


We've been using Colorblinds Bruce RGB as a source profile. Does any one
have
any thoughts on that also?

Well... it is Bruce Fraser's not ColorBlind's (although you may have downloaded it from them or received it from them in some way)

Bruce RGB was specified as an alternative to Adobe RGB (1998) to avoid banding that may have occurred in the larger Adobe space. As this does not seem to happen in production, Bruce - and others - are now typically recommending Adobe RGB instead.


Steve builds very good profiles. If you get one built by him, you may find it instructive to compare the gamuts of the Lightjet, Adobe RGB, and Bruce RGB using his excellent ColorThink software's 3D gamut viewer. In most of the LightJet profiles I've seen, Adobe RGB preserves some dark greens that BruceRGB clips. Don't fix anything that isn't broken, but I really intended BruceRGB for CMYK offset and inkjet output, for which it still provides a fairly comfortable fit, rather than the wider gamut achievable by LightJets and Lambdas.

The banding issue was a concern when I was dealing with 1995 captures in 1998 -- I had a lot of images from capture devices that delivered maybe six good bits per channel. I don't think anyone today is making capture devices that won't withstand the rigors of Adobe RGB...

Bruce
--
email@hidden


References: 
 >Custom Made icc profiles for Lightjet (From: "Timothy C. Pitts" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Custom Made icc profiles for Lightjet (From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Regarding 6500K light source
  • Next by Date: Re: Monitor Calibration
  • Previous by thread: Re: Custom Made icc profiles for Lightjet
  • Next by thread: Re: Which scanner "Job Setting" to produce raw RGB
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread