• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: BruceLindbloom's 16bit PS observations OT
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BruceLindbloom's 16bit PS observations OT


  • Subject: Re: BruceLindbloom's 16bit PS observations OT
  • From: "Adriano Von Markendorf" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 20:23:41 -0200

..Clip...
> Some experts say we can get more
> from an image in 16 bit.
> Others say it introduces posterization and or banding by using one of the
> large gamut spaces. I'm not trying to start the Mac PC kind of debate.
> We all want the best of our images whatever the way.
> The variations in the info leaves me more confused, not less.
> Anyone care to state their experience or opinions?

> Feel free to email me off list.
Me too...please !

I would liked to know any comments about this subject.
I don't really know what the best way to guide this hottest discussion.

Patience..I guess....

But, I think that a concise info ( workarounds perhaps? )
from Adobe folk's will be very welcome.

Love & Peace,

Adriano von Markendorf email@hidden
"I-C-Cm vitamin's inside" Rio de Janeiro - Brazil


References: 
 >BruceLindbloom's 16bit PS observations OT (From: Brett Baunton Imagery <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Dye vs Pigments wearability
  • Next by Date: Re: Best CMYK profiling software
  • Previous by thread: BruceLindbloom's 16bit PS observations OT
  • Next by thread: BruceLindbloom's 16bit PS observations OT
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread