• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Dye vs Pigments wearability
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dye vs Pigments wearability


  • Subject: Re: Dye vs Pigments wearability
  • From: SKID Photography <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 17:09:54 -0500
  • Organization: SKID Photography

Jim,
Are you using the same papers? It could make a difference.

Also, this might be a better question for the Epson 9000 listserv (it's a yahoo list)
where there are many people who will have experience in just such issues.

Harvey Ferdschneider
partner, SKID Photography, NYC



> I have a client who uses both the Epson 10K and 9500. The Epson 10k uses the
> Photodye inks and the 9500 the pigments.
>
> While the color is gorgeous on the 10K, my client is experiencing that the
> 10k prints scratch easily when they mount them for their museum, where as
> the 9500 prints are more durable and are less likely to scratch during their
> mounting process.
>
> What I would like to know is do the third party photo dye inks wear any
> better than Epsons photodye inks?
>
> Or this this a question for another list?
>
> Jim Rich


References: 
 >Dye vs Pigments wearability (From: Jim Rich <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Dye vs Pigments wearability
  • Next by Date: Re: BruceLindbloom's 16bit PS observations OT
  • Previous by thread: Dye vs Pigments wearability
  • Next by thread: Portable Spectrophotometers
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread