• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: RGB working space in PS
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RGB working space in PS


  • Subject: Re: RGB working space in PS
  • From: email@hidden (Bruce Fraser)
  • Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 12:10:06 -0800

At 1:54 AM -0800 2/20/02, DScharf wrote:


EktaSpace (or JoeRGB) looks like a reasonable space for a level 2
archive and for editing for film recorder output. I also archive all my
direct digital acquisitions from my S.E.M.'s detector photomultiplier
amplifiers as raw files. Can you tell me what the Ektaspace co-ordinates
are ( I have a rough idea), as the file is no longer posted on the site
you referred to?

Gamma =2.2

White point =D50 (White xy = 0.3457,0.3585)

R xy= 0.6950,0.3050
G xy= 0.2600,0.7000
Bxy= 0.1100,0.0050

Joe also created a LUT-based Ektaspace for which he quite reasonably wanted money. I'm not sure what the status is on that nowadays. If you're curious, you can contact him at email@hidden

Does it sound like a reasonable strategy to take an Ektaspace tagged
file and, using Adobe RGB 1998, "convert to working space", for files
that will be output to ink-jet printer?

I'd be more inclined to go from Ektaspace straight to inkjet space. I don't see what the extra conversion would get you on the majority of files. (The one case would be where you needed to make an edit that was smaller than te granularity of Ektaspace, and for some reason you didn't want to do it in final inkjet space.) Conversions between same-gamma working spaces are pretty benign so it won't do anything terrible, but I don't think it would do anything terribly more useful thah simply using Ektaspace as your working space.

Can Adobe RGB 1998 gamut space be modified so the Yellow (B+)
co-ordinate is more into the yellow region, in order to encompass the
capability of the new ink-jet printer inks, even though this would
probably create Greens that could not be displayed on a monitor? Or is
there little advantage to that with a well profiled printer-ink-paper
combo?

Possible, yes. Advisable? I'm not convinced. Adobe RGB already contains a lot of greens that are outside the gamut of any device. Ektaspace covers any inkjet gamut I've yet seen.

Bruce
--
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: RGB working space in PS (From: DScharf <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: An Observation
  • Next by Date: Frontier sRGB
  • Previous by thread: RE: RGB working space in PS
  • Next by thread: RE: RGB working space in PS
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread