Re: Colormatch vs Adobe 98
Re: Colormatch vs Adobe 98
- Subject: Re: Colormatch vs Adobe 98
- From: neil snape <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 08:01:31 +0100
on 28/01/2002 23:40, Luc Delahaye at email@hidden wrote:
I'm a photographer, scanning my pictures which must be good enough
>
for use in magazines or books, and digital printing. In which color space
>
should I work? I've been using Colormatch for several years now, but some
>
people around me are saying that Adobe 98 is the new standard in the
>
prepress industry. Thank you for your help.
Should rather would be which choice would be a reasonable all round space in
which to edit and archive. You're right in that ColorMatch is a conservative
space , Adobe 98 keeps a lot more color. For printing on glossy stocks the
European press defaults for coated stock give reliable separations. Be
careful though if you're sending rgb images as most of the time people leave
color management turned of. This could then be any space and your numbers
will no longer have any definition.
Neil Snape email@hidden
http://mapage.noos.fr/nsnape