Re: Scan Backs
Re: Scan Backs
- Subject: Re: Scan Backs
- From: Rudy Vonk <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:51:38 +0200
Dick Busher informed us:
>
However, 100mb files from 35mm transparency scans @ 5000 dpi on my
>
ScanMate 5000 are quite acceptable.
Pray tell us what magic film you are using. In my clearly
underprivileged experience, a 100 Mb file from 35 mm film is as useful
as an ashtray on a motorbike :-)
In any case, I respectfully suggest that perhaps your publicly
recognized success is due in a large part to what takes place *after*
the original image capture, and that you are giving credit to the film
and/or scanner manufacturer that really belongs to you. After all, if it
were easy, everybody would be doing it...
I would have thought, though, that notwithstanding all the other
advantages of digital capture that various friends have posted in this
thread, dynamic range alone would suffice to tip the decision towards
scan backs (provided the paintings sit still, of course).
--
__________________________________
Rudy Vonk
Oviedo, Spain
<email@hidden>
+34 607 354100
You can't always want what you get.
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.