Re: AW: Standard CMYK Proofing
Re: AW: Standard CMYK Proofing
- Subject: Re: AW: Standard CMYK Proofing
- From: neil snape <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 19:33:03 +0100
on 24/03/2002 18:28, Terry Wyse at email@hidden wrote:
>
Ulf, what do you think of the idea of using, as a "reference" profile only,
>
a profile that is built using 100%K limit and 400% total ink? This stems
>
from the idea that the press profiling target was likely run with
>
100%/400%TAC and that is how the reference profile should be generated.
>
Naturally, this profile should NOT be used in Photoshop for generating
>
actual separations. My reasoning for this approach is that I cannot assume
>
that all images/pages being sent to the BestRIP will already be limited to
>
something close to my CMYK separation profile that has, say, 320%TAC. In
>
fact, most page objects will contain CMYK values that are outside of the
>
parameters of my CMYK separation profile. 100%K text would be one easy
>
example of this. Comments?
>
>
Terry
Terry this brings us back a turn to what Heidelberg really wanted in that
seps are done with nothing but perceptual, and the return proofing relative
the max of the proofing device. Causing quite a discussion in their camp,
they reluctantly changed it in PO 4. Yet do you think they might have been
right and showed good foresight?
Neil Snape email@hidden
http://mapage.noos.fr/nsnape
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.