profiling for chemistry vs ink prints
profiling for chemistry vs ink prints
- Subject: profiling for chemistry vs ink prints
- From: Andrew Visscher <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 23:42:19 -0400
I was recently told by a color lab that the reason they don't provide profiles for their photographic printers is that the chemistry process is not consistent enough for use with profiles, unlike inkjet prints where the ink stays consistent from print to print. Immediately after this comment, they suggested the old story of "we'll give you a print and you can adjust your monitor or make a PhotoShop action to adjust the image to match the print."
This made no sense to me because if they can promise to continue to print such that the sample print will match the adjustments that they suggest, doesn't that mean they are able to keep their chemistry process consistent? Also, how could they even go about doing their own color correction for prints if their own process changes all the time?
Not being an expert on this topic myself, I was hoping someone more knowledgeable could tell me what I'm missing here... Can digital photographic printers using a chemistry process be reliably profiled?
Thank you.
- Andy
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.