Re: Inkjet press simulation methods and RIPs
Re: Inkjet press simulation methods and RIPs
- Subject: Re: Inkjet press simulation methods and RIPs
- From: "Chris Irvine" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 14:43:00 -0700
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 23:26:26 +0200
neil snape <email@hidden> wrote:
>
...
>
So if you've made
>
separations to SwopV2 , send it in whatever format to the rip it is first
>
mapped to the reference profile. If it's the same as the embedded profile or
>
chosen reference profile a null transform should occur>thus SWOPV2 retains
>
it's colorimetry intact. Then the data is run to the larger paper profile in
>
relative or absolute rendering simulating the reference profile.
>
To see what your SwopV2 data would look like in another reference profile,
>
simply choose a different profile, even if it's a press profile made from
>
non ICC savvy color management.
I understand your null transform approach. The problem here is that choosing a different reference profile to simulate, defeats the needed null transform effect. In order for this to still work the embedded profile(s) would have to also reassigned. Or possibly the assumed source profile changed to match the new 'reference' profile. This seems like a lot of tail chasing for day to day operations.
Do you know of any RIP's that are more straight forward in their handling of this?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Irvine On-line store->
http://www.tfaw.com/
Information Systems Manager phone: 503-652-8815
Dark Horse Comics, Inc.
http://www.darkhorse.com/
mailto:email@hidden spam
mailto:email@hidden
PGP Key ID: 0x0263648A
PGP F.P. 8CEF 1BC8 F763 DF79 6F38 3156 EA30 50DF 0263 648A
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.