Re: Soft/Hard wares for profiles
Re: Soft/Hard wares for profiles
- Subject: Re: Soft/Hard wares for profiles
- From: "Andrew Rodney" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 21:37:55 -0600
on 9/27/02 8:22 PM, Jack Fulton at email@hidden wrote:
>
What happened? Is there a noticeable difference? I ask, because we have
>
been using the ColorVision stuff and obtain excellent results. So, I wonder
>
if it has become passi.
ProfilerPro is a good package that makes good RGB output profiles (for CMYK,
ask Chris Murphy about his Seybold findings). ProfilerPro can't compete for
feature set by a mile compared to ProfileMaker Pro (sorry David) but then
ProfilerPro cost a hell of a lot less. Heck, if you want to even use most
Spectrophotometer's, Color Vision actually advises you download the demo
version of ProfileMaker and use it's MeasureTool to get readings into
ProfilerPro!
Andrew Rodney
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.