Re: ECI 2002V or 2002R?
Re: ECI 2002V or 2002R?
- Subject: Re: ECI 2002V or 2002R?
- From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 11:57:55 -0700
At 8:23 PM +0200 9/28/02, Henrik Holmegaard wrote:
To be honest I don't understand the original reasoning behind the
systematic layout of test charts. One of many industry foibles,
maybe.
Well, it's a lot easier to create a systematic chart than a scrambled
one. You always start out with some set of numbers where the channels
vary systematically. To create a scrambled chart requires a
non-trivial extra step.
And, it's a lot easier to see what's going on with the device on a
systematic chart than it is on a scrambled one.
None of which is to argue against scrambled charts -- I use them if I
think I'll benefit from doing so. But there are reasons to use
systematic ones too.
B
--
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.