Re: Digital Camera Profiling
Re: Digital Camera Profiling
- Subject: Re: Digital Camera Profiling
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:41:34 EDT
In a message dated 4/17/03 4:33:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
email@hidden writes:
>
>Why is Adobe charging $99 when they have already said it will be included
>
in
>
>the next version of Photoshop?
>
>
Because it's NOT in the current version and many people will happily shell
>
out a very reasonable $99 to get the product today. Anyone that's charging
>
for photography will, pay for the software the first shoot.
>
>
Andrew Rodney
>
>
You are correct in saying that it is a reasonable price.
What I wanted to add before prematurely hitting the "send now" button was
that it seems like it would have been a golden opportunity for Adobe to get
people to register their Photoshop software by offering the plug-in at "no
charge" for registered users. Especially if they knew it would eventually be
free.
Make any sense to do such a thing, knowing how the fight against piracy is an
on-going battle?
Personally, I don't currently have a need for ACR, so I have no vested
interest either way.
Ralph Tomaccio
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.