• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Heavy posterization
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Heavy posterization


  • Subject: Re: Heavy posterization
  • From: gariba <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 01:22:05 -0300

Chris,
no, there is not extraneous color casts, but a hard posterization in the flesh colors in the dark to bright transition.
In the other color of images there is no such effects...And the images showing this are converted to AdobeRGB or US Shetfeed Coated, no one is ColorMatch.
I will build other profile using Photorealistic as you suggests. About this regard, since I'm using EyeOne, let me ask you: if I read the patches one at once will I get a more accurate result than using the strip rule?
Thanks, gariba.
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 12:49 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:

On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 06:04 PM, gariba <email@hidden>

I'm getting a very heavy posterization in the flesh colors of all the
images of people I'm printing at Epson 1270, 720 dpi, with a custom
profile for the ink/paper combination I'm using. The tonal transitions
in other colors than flesh seems smooth, with almost no banding. Have
somebody seen this? Could this be related to some in the profile itself?

Is it a very fine bit of banding where you get a slight green cast on one side of the band and an abrupt magenta cast on the other? If so, yes I've seen this.

It's possible that a profile can exacerbate pre-existing posterization due to exceptional non-linear tone response. I'd had much better luck using PhotoEnhance4 mode with the older drivers, and Color Controls>PhotoRealistic with newer drivers. The catch is that while you get much more linear tone response, there is a smaller gamut. For photos, I think this is less of a problem than the posterization. The other catch is that you'll need a custom profile, or futz with the output until you get used to the new behavior of the printer. If I recall correctly, this is easiest if the editing space is ColorMatch RGB if you're on a Macintosh since the Mac driver is expecting a gamma of 1.8 for the source image.

Anyway, the only other thing I can suggest would be to use something other than the native 1270 driver. If you're using Mac OS X, then you might see if the 4.2.6-pre1 version of gimp-print drivers will do a better job in this regard.

Chris Murphy
Color Remedies (TM)
www.colorremedies.com/realworldcolor
---------------------------------------------------------
Co-author "Real World Color Management"
Published by PeachPit Press (ISBN 0-201-77340-6)
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


Clinica Tratamento de Imagem,
Irico Vermssimo, 614, 301,
Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
90.180-160.
Fone/Fax 3231 0216
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Heavy posterization
      • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Heavy posterization (From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Heavy posterization
  • Next by Date: Re: monitor choice/calibration system
  • Previous by thread: Re: Heavy posterization
  • Next by thread: Re: Heavy posterization
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread