Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers
Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers
- Subject: Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers
- From: John Gnaegy <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:07:15 -0800
Can we look forward to a New and Improved version of the ColorSync on
MacOS X document in the future to clarify some of this? Or is the
current implementation state just as confusing as it seems such that
more documentation would just reaffirm the confusion?
What part is confusing? As it is now, standard Cocoa behavior is to
match images to the display's profile. In the case of untagged data,
the display's profile is assumed as the source, which means basically
that no match occurs.
I can't speak for non-graphics-intensive apps developed by other
companies, but ideally they should mimic this behavior. If they use
standard Cocoa behavior it's inherited for free. Graphics intensive
apps like Photoshop will almost surely always behave differently
because they'll almost almost allow the user to have more control over
color conversions.
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
| References: | |
| | >Panther, sRGB, web browsers (From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers (From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers (From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers (From: John Gnaegy <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers (From: John Fieber <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers (From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Panther, sRGB, web browsers (From: John Fieber <email@hidden>) |