Re: ECI charts sharing X IT8
Re: ECI charts sharing X IT8
- Subject: Re: ECI charts sharing X IT8
- From: "Adriano Von Markendorf" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:46:31 -0300
>
"Adriano Von Markendorf" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>supposing that I will use the *same* ECI to made my proof and press
>
>profile would be less interpolation problems?
Henrik Holmegaard <email@hidden> reply:
>
Interpolation isn't undesirable. If the printing process is very
>
non-linear and if the instrument is very slow, use a small chart with
>
averaging and build a small profile to allow more room for
>
interpolation, because more interpolation is sometimes better.
Terry Wyse just share this same oppinion and experience.
I'm not sure, but I vaguely remember that was told in List that *may* be
have loss of performance for some differents grid points engages -eg. few
patches X lot patches.
Anyway I imagine that Less Is Better when will be profiling a small gamut
device for ex? or non-much-stable, perhaps?
I think in use the ECI random chart to profile a brand new Heidelberg
SpeedMaster 74-4/+ UV varnish.
>
Other
>
things being equal the issue with large test charts has always been
>
that the larger the chart the higher the risk of manual measuring
>
errors. The MeasureTool and the iCColor address that.
I don't have the iCColor but MeasureTool.
BTW, the Heidelberg staff instruct to leave the ink control -eg. the result
seems to me just like an equalizer graphic shape- to RIP engine, any
thoughts about?
Summer greetings from Rio.:-p -Very, very hot here -
Adriano von Markendorf email@hidden
"I-C-Cm vitamin's inside" Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.