Re: Camera Raw
Re: Camera Raw
- Subject: Re: Camera Raw
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:12:00 -0700
on 2/23/03 3:15 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
What we need to understand is that the ICC spec is a work in progress,
>
and when it comes to the input profile class, was designed with
>
scanners in mind, not digital cameras. This means the likely
>
possibility that the spec is simply insufficient in the area of
>
characterizing digital cameras; and it doesn't mean that it won't work
>
in certain situations, it just means it's not nearly as reliable as it
>
needs to be.
Beautifully summed up! I've found situations where input profiles for
cameras worked wonderfully and didn't work worth a damn (the same product).
There's certainly something in the spec or how the products are being
produced that needs a bit more work. I know many are attempting to push the
envelope and the time may come where a product succeeds in always producing
a desired result but I haven't come across that product yet. Reliability, as
you point out needs some work.
Andrew Rodney
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.