• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Print driver in MacOS X
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Print driver in MacOS X


  • Subject: Re: Print driver in MacOS X
  • From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:39:22 -0600

On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 05:51 PM, Xavier Niebla <email@hidden> writes:

Some one can clarify this for me:
When printing to non PostScript printer like Inkjets in Windows, the
interpretation is done by GDI and in MacOS 9 is done thru QuickDraw;
but what happens in MacOS X?

There are two possible print paths. Carbon applications can, and often do still use QuickDraw, which is then handled by Quartz. Other Carbon and all Cocoa and Java apps use Quartz.

I guess this is done by Quartz which is a
PDF engine at system level (am I right?).

There is a PDF to raster processor in OS X, yes. There is currently no PostScript interpreter built into OS X, but you can download one.

If this is correct, any
printer in MacOS X is PostScript by nature, and if ColorSync is built
in Quartz is possible to color manage any print at system lever.

No. PDF and PostScript aren't the same thing. Any printer effectively benefits from OS X being a "PDF RIP". If you install a PostScript RIP like Ghostscript, then any printer for which there are CUPS drivers then becomes a PostScript RIP. There is currently no PostScript interpreter built into OS X, but you can download one (such as Ghostscript).

Purportedly Ghostscript and Gimp-print drivers will be included in the next major release of OS X. So from that point of view any Gimp-print supported printer is effective a PostScript printer.

So,
what is the purpose of using a 3th party RIP? I think that a RIP is
unnecessary in MacOS X if the system has a built in RIP based on PDF
which is the successor of PostScript.

PDF is a superset of PostScript. PDF is a file format. PostScript is a programming language. PDF is declarative, and PostScript is interpretive. So they aren't really the same thing. PDF is much more device dependent than PostScript.

Can I trust the interpretation of
the PostScript done by Quartz while printing from applications like
InDesign or Freehand?

There is no PostScript handling by Quartz. Such as it is, I see scaling and font rendering differences when the Quartz PDF to raster RIP is used compared to Acrobat or InDesign. But I've also seen this among different Level 3 RIPs as well. So go figure...

Chris Murphy
Color Remedies (TM)
www.colorremedies.com/realworldcolor
---------------------------------------------------------
Co-author "Real World Color Management"
Published by PeachPit Press (ISBN 0-201-77340-6)
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Prev by Date: Re: How to register ColorSync devices?
  • Next by Date: 6-channel-separation
  • Previous by thread: Re: Print driver in MacOS X
  • Next by thread: Re: Print driver in MacOS X
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread