Re: Review of Large-Format Inkjet Contract Proofers
Re: Review of Large-Format Inkjet Contract Proofers
- Subject: Re: Review of Large-Format Inkjet Contract Proofers
- From: Terry Wyse <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 18:21:31 -0400
on 5/7/03 10:41 AM, Andrew Rodney wrote:
>
I'm in Terry's camp. No issues at all doing very accurate cross simulation
>
using UC inks. The big benefit I see is super fast dry down and stability.
>
The Dye based inks were always a problem because the print never appeared
>
the same out of the printer, an hour latter and even a day latter. Who wants
>
to wait for a print to "dry down" when doing proofing? Doing profile tuning
>
on dye based inks was a huge hassle since you had to tune for the appearance
>
at what point, out of the unit or a day latter?
Geez, Andrew just said in a paragraph what just took me several pages to put
in writing. Maybe I should be an author? Or not. Maybe a speaker? DEFINITELY
not. :-)
Terry
--
__________________________________
WyseConsul
Color Management Consulting
v 704.843.0858
e email@hidden
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.